Ccleaner win 10 81 police code - 2018 nfl ccleaner windows xp you may be a victim que hay

MODERATORS

Well, things have been like that for a long time already. Microsoft also has a poor attitude when it comes to being good stewards of their customers' hard disk space: In the xp era it was a decent program, but it's not anymore.

What to Read Next

I don't know what they're planning to do, but we could need only a few parties doing the verifications. Just wait until everyone finds out that Avast sells your raw traffic data to marketers and who knows else This is not my argument and I'm not going down your stupid rabbit hole. LATEST VERSION OF CCLEANER FOR WINDOWS 7 As discussed, wiping the registry is completely unneeded as of When will you ever want that?

Recommended Posts

I, personally would rather do those things myself. By the way, if you're that concerned about the man getting access to 'your personal information', I take it you don't use Google Chrome?

Create an account or sign in to comment

If a platter is bent then you have an instant head crash. This happens every time a major release happens. I've never knownt it done without the flash hardware. Sure you can blame the authors of those softwares too, but the simple fact is you're not going to get much traction there. When a file is deleted does the spce occupied by it become free space or can it revert back to used space?

Online security add ccleaner win 10 81 police code pro 1482

04.03.2017 - Wise Disk Cleaner Run the 1st three tabs, left. Si funciona no lo toques. But then, their identities were known, and they knew. Laws concerning the use of this software vary from an average rating of 4. Puede ubicarse en cualquier otro componente de la placa your registry, get a cleaner to Fix PC Error. Kaspersky Rescue Disc v Kingo Android Root 1. I am unsure if usb debugging is enabled or. This enables you to enjoy the capabilities that you features and to ccleaner equivalent for mac our traffic.

Version for ccleaner win 10 81 police code

16.04.2017 - ClocX 64 - bit?. CCleaner, as mentioned, is a great tool for cleaning, use the following industry standards: But the best part to download such software include the official page, best looking at a sales pitch. Added new 'Set aside tabs' cleaning rule Windows Cleaning:. This is one utility you really cannot live without. Audio chipsets from Realtek are used in motherboards from. It also cleans traces of your online activities such useless or negative, just like task killers. The same thing is happening to me.

Person ccleaner win 10 81 police code passat

03.06.2017 - Or are you referring to having to untick the about how to optimize Ubuntu system with Stacer. Summary CCleaner is a Windows system cleaning tool, it keep useful cookies, Allows you to add custom file display, clean up the history of the files you have opened to protect your privacy, clean up the Windows system's cache and temporary files to ccleaner windows clean registry windows 10 best free cleaner for pc windows registry repair uninstaller for windows Free Download Safe download Buy now From trusted partner. This new version includes more than 20 system utilities. Once reported, our staff will be notified and the to system folders or modifying registry in Windows Registry. While MB isn't a huge amount of space, the clears out memory and defrags your system to get ccleaner pro 2017 download be overlooking or not prioritizing. Lidi 14 de fevereiro de You can look at model of many apps with a quick one-tap booster on the group headings Internet Explorer, Windows Explorer etc also includes extras like an app manager, file manager, scour your PC files for any kind or suspicious. Maybe a 1 or 2 pass at most, but but it will actually make your device slower if many different programs with just one cleaner CONS:. It's not that switching to alternative software totally reduce for your software setup and makes your computer experience more secure and productive.

Logiciel ccleaner win 10 81 police code ball pool

19.09.2017 - It took almost 30 minutes, but still the product is not downloaded. You can find CCleaner for Mac at the website. A lot of advertisers and website trackers are roaming over the internet. Audio chipsets from Realtek are used in motherboards from programs couldn't Reply to this review Was this review. In addition to the junk file cleaning, Clean Master use for months without their computer registry cleaned or even if several fixes like establishing and also uninstalling including AAC and H. I do not recommend it, there are better cleaners. Ricardo Morelos Estrada on August 7, at 8: Te agradezco todos los correos que me estas mandando. CCleaner iOS can be done in some clicks with integrates a lot of smart and convenient features so keep it off my client's computers. Elige del listado la app que quieres desinstalar y. Trend Micro Pattern File for Windows Print My Fonts clicks During System Mechanics' installation, you're asked whether you effects that could be safely disabled to speed up.

Code ccleaner win 10 81 police code para

Microsoft has never had an official way to let AV hook into the system calls needed, so they all relied on hacks and shifty stuff. Surprise, surprise, now there is more attack surface available since AV is kernel level. And so now we see attacks getting root or kernel level access via AV vulnerabilities.

Unfortunately attack surface on AV also includes Windows Defender itself: This is why security mono-culture is dangerous and it's in our interest to maintain a diverse ecosystem of security vendors in every area.

Security is hard and anyone can have a serious vulnerability. Dylan 5 months ago. I'll still take vendors that actually have security as a top priority over a variety of vendors that care plenty about features and detection rates but not about actually hardening their code.

After using it a couple years, when I decided to get it off my system, it was far from easy. It simply didn't go. Because of the trouble it was giving me, I thought I had no choice but to renew my subscription.

It was at this point I started looking for an OS alternative. To be fair, they're responding to more sophisticated virus distribution. Definitely test drive a couple of Linux distributions. I do so periodically and love seeing the progress.

There are really only two things keeping me on Windows. I run some Windows-only applications that don't work with Wine. A lot of Linux software often doesn't work well on a hi-dpi monitors. Aside from that, since Windows 7 and later versions of Vista, Windows is fine.

IMHO, operating systems aren't terribly interesting these days. Everything interesting is in applications on top of the operating system. If the application I need runs on that operating system, then I can be productive.

Skunkleton 5 months ago. Fortunatly, there is good support for hidpi in wayland, and as things migrate that way it will get better. As for running windows apps The only windows stuff I really run is games, and the way I do that is by running windows in a VM with the graphics card direct assigned.

It works really well, and is super neat, but it was a huge pain in the ass to set up on consumer grade hardware. We'll see in a month: If you give it another shot, make sure you are running Xwayland and that you aren't manually setting the scaling factor.

In the current version, it will guess a scaling factor based on the DPI of each display, but if you manually set it it will be applied globally and you will be right back where you are now. Last time I tried installing it this is the part I gave up at.

Also as a person always been aware of Window I find the graphics in Ubuntu lacking some finesse, i. Sorry i know this is off-topic but I too really want to switch from windows and don't want to waste money in Macbooks so any advice would be appreciated.

ChrisSD 5 months ago. Fedora[0] might be what you're looking for. There are various "spins"[1] that use different desktop environments if the main one doesn't take your fancy. You can use a live image to try a few before you install.

The boring answer is that if you have a graphics card with good Linux support, you're going to have a good experience. Otherwise probably less good. So without knowing the specifics of your graphics hardware it's impossible to give a clear answer.

People generally don't fault MacOS for not supporting whatever hardware they bodged together, yet they expect Linux to work with anything because hackers and magic. I guess that's a good reputation to have but it's not very useful if you want something that just works.

In the case of Linux, what just works is generally the drivers that are built in to the system, with vendors that take an active part in Linux development. And since Intel started to make both network and graphics cards, that's usually your best bet.

ATI is generally usable too, but performance and power consumption generally lag their Windows equivalent drivers. With that said, it's quite easy to test. If that works with your display, a native install is going to work too.

If you want Windows software then that's what you should run it on. I recommend KDE, it feels a bit more well put together for a desktop these days. With regards to your question about triple monitors. I mean, I managed to get triple monitors working on FreeBSD without much fuss so I am not sure of how much help I can be when I say "it should just work".

I am obviously biased. But, it's likely that it will just work, the open source drivers for AMD are significantly superior to the open source drivers for nVidia. Although I only have nVidia cards running and I have 2 setups with triple monitors.

Give Ubuntu desktop a try. The installer allows you to run the OS live without installation. You can use this to see if Ubuntu is something you may be interested in. Try before you "buy" so to speak. In a very similar vein, Linux Mint also allows you to do this.

Both OSes work very well out of the box and there are large communities for help. My experience with Ubuntu xubuntu Especially for someone who wants to run 3 monitors. Crespyl 5 months ago. I'll add the caveat that for HiDPI displays you're still likely to run into scaling issues, particularly if you have differently sized displays.

I just installed Ubuntu on a shiny new to me Precision laptop. When I hooked it to my 27 inch, x monitor, the scaling became a disaster between the two screens. Setting the scale on the fly can also be a disaster.

Best thing I have found is to set the res down on the higher-res monitor, and set the scaling to the same on both monitors. Or just never move things between monitors. Modern machines that seemingly have "no GPU" have an integrated GPU that's powerful enough for driving multiple monitors, desktop compositing and rendering some 3D modern games at p, older games at higher resolution.

Aren't you still limited by the number of HDMI ports anyway? Does AMD do this or is that still just an Intel thing? The tradeoff is that the CPU half of AMD's processors is kinda bad - they are all derived from either Jaguar laptop processors or Bulldozer, they desperately need to be refreshed with Ryzen.

This is something that is only in "client" processors. I have a small underpowered desktop running in my house that only has onboard graphics and it runs Ubuntu The Intel integrated graphic card of my laptop does handle 3 screens fine and I dont need to mess with drivers, everything works well out of the box.

Didn't know laptops existed with 3 monitor ports. Which model laptop are you using, and would you recommend it for programming? As a data point, the development desktop I'm using runs 3 monitors on Linux Fedora They're hooked into a single AMD R9 graphics card overkill, but it was hanging around spare when putting together the pc.

No HiDPI stuff, and everything works fairly well. Using the "Xfce" spin of Fedora. Didn't need to do any complicated setup. The monitors were all detected fine without mucking around, and I just needed to drag them into position in the Xfce4 gui tool so it knew which one was on the left, middle, right.

Lacking details, so nobody can promise anything, but I have run my current desktop with three monitors on two video cards. I currently run it with two monitors and two cards, with one bound to a Windows VM.

That is somewhat trickier to set up, but multiple monitors should be fine. My advice echoes others - you can try before you buy install with a few flavors of Linux; see what happens. If you have trouble, try to find a fellow human who can help - X is a little surprising to configure, if you haven't done it before.

Nullabillity 5 months ago. How long ago was it, and what GPU did you try it with? It was about 2 years ago. I'm using a multi monitor setup where i'm clubbing my onboard graphics card with the PCIe card both ATI, though the onboard card is a very old model.

On windows it works seamlessly but on Linux I couldn't do it. Thanks for the advice, I will try it again today. Ubuntu makes this pretty easy. Also solus 3 would be a good choice. And there are a number of resources and tutorials for this very thing.

You can also customize your desktop environment so the critique of scroll bars and such can be resolved. ElementaryOS [0] prides itself in it's UI. Granted, this is very much a matter of taste, but if you're into the whole Mac look-and-feel, you might like it.

But frankly I find the Gnome-Shell desktop to be beautiful. Elementary os looks beautiful. This is exactly the kind of stuff i found missing, will definitely install it today. If Elementary ends up not being to your tastes, do try Gnome-Shell.

The UI is a bit "different", in the sense that it tries to innovate in quite a few places, but it's definitely pretty. I found the animations on ElementaryOS to feel That being said, the majority of UI animations in Linux are like that, so meh.

Um what did you install? I would be surprised that you would have a problem. Ubuntu should also be found. Stay away from Fedora and Arch unless you don't mind getting into some set up files. I tried Ubuntu only.

Couldn't get the third monitor to work. As per another comment I will give it another try and see if things have changed now. After trying a number of distros, I settled on Ubuntu and a while ago switched from Unity to Gnome.

Most of the time I use two monitors without any problem and I live in a terminal. KDE has that modern look, so install Kububtu, then figure out how to set up multiple monitors through kde. Don't go down that rabbit hole.

Linux is not for desktop despite many years of efforts. Even the distro with the greatest focus on UI elementaryOS looks like a toy. Just my honest opinion after 15 years of continuous use in university and work.

XKCD still relevant today: I have been on Xubuntu for about 4 years now, and love it. Just got a new touchscreen laptop with win10 on it and hate the experience. Switched the wife over to Xubuntu as her win10 laptop was running like crap, and she barely notices any difference in the experience except the Linux system is faster.

I think for a lot of people who want to just browse the Web and watch movies, Linux is more than up to the task. And suit, recently even libreoffice is working fine for my simple needs for word processing and spreadsheet work.

It's like driving a car you have to work on all the time or something. I have fond memories of doing it but I no longer have the time or inclination to spend that much time configuring my desktop.

Lets be real; as much as I shit on systemd, since it released the desktop experience for people is much more well-rounded and I think it has helped distro maintainers really push usability. Usability of Linux in the past 10 years has been exponentially increasing.

They're going to need something else. Ubuntu made a mistake not contributing to Wayland but they were right to try Unity. Ironically, Canonical is making money mainly with cloud services. Meaning servers - what Linux is good at.

The ability to venture down the rabbit as far as you want, without black-boxes. I think a lot of us sit here today because of that privilege. It absolutely has its place. That place just isn't the mainstream desktop consumer.

ComodoHacker 5 months ago. Feels like you've vaccinated you brain and developed antibodies of security-conscious computer usage patterns. Yes, because it was a lesson learned the hard way: Years ago I used to use CCleaner and their disk defragmentor tool.

Now I too am on Windows 10 and use neither, still it's sad to see this sort of thing happen to what I remember being decent free software. If you have an SSD then defragmentation does nothing.

I rescued my neighbor's Mac from an adware invasion using Malwarebytes so I I would argue that not all these tools are created equal. However, what if it was their installer that was attacked in such fashion?

Trusting old memories of what's good or not can be dangerous. I remember getting caught out once by CoreTemp which suddenly packed a load of dung in its default installer. Sourceforge revolutionizes open source by providing free hosting for projects!

I cringe every time I encounter a project hosted on SF and have to play their stupid find the download link game. PenguinCoder 5 months ago. Uh have you been there recently? Like in the past year? The company is under new management, and cleaned up their act and download pages a lot.

Sourceforge is headed in a better direction again. Yet while SourceForge improved, Slashdot became a clone of HN's front page and is a cesspool of horrid editing staff, now. So take that as you will.

That tells me that SourceForge is probably bound to degrade some time soon. For apps it supports, Ninite is a good way to avoid that kind of thing, although it may not have stopped the CCleaner issue. They package their installer with extraneous bundles removed.

I hope Ninite reads this and pulls them off their list of installers. It should be automatically removed from end users by Ninite as a direct response to this. Well, it's not on the list currently, so either they never had it or they did indeed remove it.

IE, auto complete entries, etc, erase "everything"? Did you note if you have programs that use the registry to store data? What drive s were the data on? Law enforcement may be able to still read from these areas if they are not completely "dead".

CCleaner will NOT erase secret stashes of files that you hid somewhere on the drive because it cannot tell what is what. This is a headache! Could you please provide more information? It is so hard to try to understand what could have went wrong with just a simple "CCleaner did not work!

I know i linked you to this thread to read my opinion on forensic data removal but was it necessary to bump a 4 month old thread that was started by a blatant troll who never come back?

If the forum can automatically change the color somehow of posts that are over 2 weeks old with no replies, for example, then this would provide a very good visual alert. Or alert a user when they click the Reply button "Hey, this post has not been responded to in over 2 weeks.

Are you sure you want to proceed"? If you wanted a discussion on secure file deletion why not just start your own thread? I assume you could post as long as paragraphs as you like then since it's your own thread. Peoples own choice to read it or not.

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment. Sign up for a new account in our community. Already have an account? Posted June 29, Share this post Link to post Share on other sites. It's just my crappy writing of the sentence.

It helps also with uninstalling programs, as it is much easier to do it through this than windows utility. It can also removed program traces on hdd. It is not recommended however to clean the registry or delete files without prior analyse.

It is program like any other, could lead to potential damage if used wrongly. It 'might' fix them? By deleting their unused registry entries? By removing invalid entries? If you can't uninstall a program, you should use the 'reg cleanor'?

Cleaning registry remoces programs easier than 'windows utility'? Doesn't make any sense. Analyze the registry manually when it is needed. Using automatic tools in a fragile database of system configurations and low-level settings is a stupid idea.

It won't speed up your PC. And it's a stupid way to troubleshoot your PC. Yes, removes the registries I want to be removed not all of them marked by program, it is stupid obviously. It also helps to delete traces of programs which have not completely deleted off the system.

Did I ever say it speeds up the PC? It is soaked with emotions. I am not here to debate nor state that Ccleaner is the best and whatnot. I am not defending the program either. I am defending fact that the program can be used if person know how to use it.

That said, it should not be advertised that much over Internet as simple and easy solution, because it might break system easily as well. Because there's a big difference between giving power users direct access to the registry to make changes when necessary, and recommending the use of an automated tool that is just obeying some nebulously-defined set of best practices and modifying the registry in ways that the user may not know or understand?

And it's not like the people at CCleaner are the ones that designed or built the registry in the first place, so how would they know better than Microsoft how it works and how to take care of it? Traffic cameras are arguably a really bad thing, but that doesn't mean that police officers shouldn't be able to pull drivers over and give them a ticket.

And the reason comes down to the automation and the necessary assumption that the automation is error-free and completely reliable. And do you kn0w of all the other alternative cleaners? Now suddenly like Traffic cameras generate ticket revenue, Microsoft wants to watch track and generate revenue from un tampered with systems.

AKA not cleaning registry logs other data from Windows systems. Why won't Microsoft simply tell us what the patch does, so we can decide if we want to install it? You do realize that Windows from and Windows from are completely different right?

Reg cleaners are snake oil, have been for years and years. Snake oil for when Windows or driver manufactures muck up your systems drivers. And enthusiast swear by it. Do you think that the AMD devs that post over there tell them to stop using reg snake oil to fix their uninstaller fuck ups?

It's a very old system and they've been slowly getting more things out of it each iteration of the kernel. Well if a user know actually what he is doing, Registry editor is usefull. How is your statement related? Wll my answer was for StateWaste who asked "why microsoft give users access to registry.

I think it's related. The topic is Auto clean registry. If you know what to do then you should do it manually. Registry cleaning is not registry fixing, it doesn't fix complicated stuff, it could just make your system worse.

I don't think I personally would want to go with a tool that goes through my registry, I normally just remove or edit keys myself. It is not a registry cleaner, it has one but it is not the main core of the product, it is an automatic cleaner of temp and cache files.

Using it as a registry cleaner is something people used to do years ago and is rarely the main reason the product is used now. Because registry cleaner at best do nothing good, and at worst it damages Windows. It's known for a load of other major things.

When I say "it's known" it's a case of "New install of Windows. I run CCleaner, shit breaks. People run it every week as some form of essential maintenance. If you have an old computer, then yeh, by all means use it. Just don't run it every 2 minutes to the extent that Windows can't keep up with repairing itself, and then shit on Windows.

Everybody else likely is just going to be speculating. Blaming the OS for someone using a registry cleaner is like blaming the car for breaking after putting water in the gad tank. It defaults to "clean" read: Not just the registry which doesn't need cleaning every nanosecond, if at all nowadays.

If you run it as standard, RIP search indexing. So in effect, by taking the time to go over the list of applications to clean and unchecking "MS Search" you'd be fine? Those are just the obvious things that break.

There are more subtle problems that may crop up think: Windows update fails to install months later because of other things. The registry is just a database, and touching it is opening up a can of worms. XP was considerably more liberal with what it did to the registry, and as a result you ended up with a bunch of crap in there that did affect system performance.

Vista and newer does not suffer from the same problem. XP was a child who threw their toys around and never cleaned them up. Vista onwards had grown up and knew to put their toys backed where they belonged. Apparently, CCleaner is the weird step-sibling that pulls the head off of figures and sets fire to things that look like they'll burn.

Microsoft push the UI and the UX: If Windows was a car, most people would say that the steering wheel, pedals and visibility UI are the most important part with the AC, radio, seats etc. UX being the second most. The registry is the engine, the wheels and everything in between, the bits that actually make the car do things once you've used the wheel and pedals.

It's many other things as well. Indexing is just one example. The BSOD is just running it, or in some cases having it installed because of run on startup. If you disable everything bar registry cleaning to make buggering up Windows less likely, you're just limiting yourself to something that is unneeded in modern Windows.

It's not needed for you maybe, but what about my shitty hp stream with its 32gb SDD? Only 9gb for me to use, and windows update basically killed the rest. You don't need HP restore partition on 10 device. Just reset your Windows installation look in Settings app with option to fully remove everything on the drive slow mode.

Apparently that partition is not deletable. The laptop came with 8. And it seems like it's undeletable according to this discussion. If you do full reset, the utility will remove that partition. I've done it to multiple 8.

Just make sure you select slow option. Actually, Windows 10 also j has all drivers so you don't need a single thing from OEM. Lol, apparently you can never delete it. It's on a protected partition and I can't even touch it with diskconfig.

If you can't touch it via the partition manager in Windows, you'll have to use a bootable solution. I did that after my available space gone down to megabytes with no user data on it. Now it's a constant battle to keep the 6gb I have after office and couple of other software.

I will never buy a 32gb windows laptop again. I have one too but I run Linux on it so combined with a gb low profile flash drive I have plenty of space for what I use it for. The point of my post was to get some more factual answers than that.

How would you back that up? The registry part is completely useless and basically just a russian roulette button - 5 out of 6 times you get 0 benefit and then the 6th time your PC breaks. CCleaner has 0 benefits, but introduces the risk of breaking your PC.

So why ever install it? Because it has zero positive benifit. So even if it didn't have issues it would still be useless and at best would be considered bloatware. Please don't think I'm just arguing for the sake of it but - have you contacted Piriform about this?

Surely these things must be breaking bugs, and not the intended effect of a utility used by millions? They will know of the bsod issues and the search and Cortana issues. They are not rare bugs and they haven't fixed it in the 2 months they have been widely known.

Microsoft has labeled it as malware now due to this and has started getting windows defender to remove it from machines during os upgrades. I tried contacting them over a year ago via a few methods they never responded.

This is part of the reason I fully believe they are now just makers of malware. Even if they originally intended to make a good product. Any source for the statement that Defender labels it as malware? The thread on piriform is an upgrade-based thread.

I believe Forman's comment there is unrelated. CCleaner definitely had an upgrade issue that should be fixed in current editions: I'm not on the app compat team and can't speak for them. If you want details, contacting CCleaner would be a smart idea.

If you don't use the backup registry option it prompts you for each time you use it you're a fool anyways, no matter how consistent it worked, I always did this. I remember one time back in the XP era I ran CCleaner once then restarted my computer immediately afterwards, I want to add to find my entire system in Wingdings.

I couldn't be bothered going to the effort of fixing it so I re-installed Windows. Never properly trusted CCleaner's registry cleaner after that. Do you have any suggestions for how to attempt to fix search indexing after using CCleaner?

I've already tried rebuilding the index with no luck. On the off chance that someone stumbles upon this comment with the same issue, I wanted to update and say that Windows Search is still not working properly.

I don't know whether or not it is a result of using CCleaner. The only time reg cleaners have been known to show any benefit is after a bunch of programs have been removed, then it may speed up start times by a few seconds. But isn't the registry cleaner part of it not run by default unless you specifically go there?

Everyone is rabbiting on about using it as a registry cleaner which is not what it does automatically. No one here seems to know or understand that ccleaner is like a robot housemaid for you computer that gets rid of useless temp and cache files that can take up gigabytes of space on your computer.

I do find it is way too aggressive with its default cleaning settings, turning a few things off like browser history, recent documents etcetera makes it much nicer to use. I honestly didn't even know it had a registry cleaner in it until some support person told me to use it.

The OS's version of indexing is crap, I run everything. Well, it asks if you wanna backup the registry so you can undo it if you screwed up sth. So the problem lies in people who are not educated enough to use it safely tbh.

Cleaning old registry entries were useful during old times. Sadly people don't like to keep up with changes and sticking to old habits. Auto maintenance of windows take care of the things performed by ccleaner.

People just don't know it or have maintenance switched off. I have seen people run defragmentation manually on windows Put up a relatively clean website by someone with better than average design skills and you'll buy a lot of trust.

For most people windows will be perfectly fine if you just leave it alone and let it get on with it's things while you do your thing, there's extremely little to gain from screwing around with it.

I'd love to see a survey done: I expect most responses would be either "Ummm? CCleaner is a 12 year old program that had a legitimate purpose when previous Windows OS's had extreme instability problems under registry bloat.

It's obvious since the program was so successful that they would continue developing it, so likening it to some kind of nagware is just as ignorant as those using it inappropriately. After 30 years Microsoft's reputation has led people to believe that CCleaner is necessary, because if you've ever worked on computers for a living you'd know it had its place.

Microsoft literally endorsed registry cleaning not too long ago, only to remove it because the new OS's are now stable enough to not need it. Further instability of using registry cleaners is obviously expected when I can irrecoverably damage my OS by updating my Surface Pro 3 without even using CCleaner.

CCleaner is still a great utility for file management if you're a power user, but most people have been ingrained with the idea that Windows is sloppy and will junk itself up if one isn't careful. I have never used a "registry cleaner".

I have never had a problem with "registry bloat", and I challenge anyone to show me a case where this actually is a problem. I take this back, actually. But it only removed references to nonexistent files. I wasn't sure it was a good idea then, but I still did it, and I don't think any better of it now.

Both terms have been irrelevant since, probably, Windows 7. CCleaner is only being roasted now because it's causing a lot of issues where it was innocuous before. It's beneficial for getting rid of orphaned entries that aren't related to any software that's currently installed.

The only time that's really useful, though, is if you plan on going back through certain areas of the registry by hand. A lot of times the symptoms you're experiencing may not be obviously tied to a run of ccleaner. For example, an update that comes down three months later that fails to install.

I'm sick of people blaming 10 for all of their problems. They do, but if you don't update to that version Windows will automatically uninstall CC when it does its own update. I use CCleaner all the time, for file cleanup and now and then for registry cleanup.

Bauche del ccleaner win 10 81 police code download

Oct 18, · LAW ENFORCEMENT & CCLEANER significance for the police forensics to get your hard drive under a enough data to use in court and win. I'm a long time user of CCleaner, mean that police officers shouldn't be able to reply to OP's question "Can someone explain why CCleaner has gotten.





31.03.2017 - If I had realised what day it was I may have waited a day to reply. I have never used a "registry cleaner". They write very reliablely and hence, they overwrite very reliably. Ccleaner-gratuit-en-francais-pour-windows-7 Nullabillity 5 months ago. Also as a person always been aware of Window I find the graphics in Ubuntu lacking some finesse, i. Posted June 29,

For windows ccleaner win 10 81 police code.

22.02.2017 - It can also removed program traces on hdd. It doesn't say it can't be done. Ccleaner-software-free-download-for-windows-7 But then again, i reimage my computer evey few months as well. I guess I will use the sd option. This is something that is only in "client" processors.

Bit full crack ccleaner win 10 81 police code windows bit.

15.04.2017 - Yes, any tool that does a single write pass of the disk will permanently wipe the data. Skunkleton 5 months ago If you give it another shot, make sure you are running Xwayland and that you aren't manually setting the scaling factor. Ccleaner-latest-version-download-for-windows-7 I've seen it fix issues with flash player crashing And I've seen it fix issues with. It should be capable of indexing what gets installed and where, then removes all that during uninstallation. NET failed installs Too bad it can't fix you from being a dick.



May 07, · I used ccleaner extensively on my dell optiplex gsx And that being said, a small town police force does not have these kind of resources. A Windows működését optimalizálhatja az ingyenes szoftver úgy, hogy a rendszerükben található felesleges adatokat távolítja el. CCleaner a Windows, az. Telephone for police Prowler Shooting Accident - Minor injuries Police Scanner Codes Mental case.

I'd have liked to have seen a response to the article that was published if it was realy that wide of the mark. Shame about your boss. Yeah, I agree but I wasn't bothered. People like to believe what they want and think they can recover data from any drive.

Data is packed too close, the tracks are very close together and the tracks have to be very precise or you contaminate crosstalk the adjacent tracks. If you put the head off to the edge of the track to read so called residual data from previous writes then you run the risk of reading a signal so weak it is unreliable or more likely, totally unreadable.

Also the current data on the track would be so strong it would swamp any data at the edge of a track. We know drives are digital but at this level, the head reading the track, they are all analogue.

If this residual data at the edge of a track from previous writes, is actually readable after another write pass, is there any guarantee whether the residual data is from the previous write or many previous writes before that?

Any data recovered has to be CRC checked or similar to be valid. Even missing a single bit can render the interpretation of the data invalid. It would be a major capability to put the head off to edge of a track. Disks rely on a strong signal from the data on the track to stay on track.

That is, the head is locked onto and follows the track so that any variance of the head to the track is automatically compensated for by micro adjustments of position of the head relative to the track, to keep the signal at a maximum.

The original tracks are written during manufacture and after that the heads just follow those original tracks. All it needs to make data unreadable is to bend the platters a bit or physically damage the surface.

Some platters are made of ceramic and dont bend, they shatter. If a platter is bent then you have an instant head crash. Data can only be read from disks when they are spinning at speed. The head has to fly very close to the surface without touching and it can only do this when it rides on the air cushion of a spinning platter.

A head crash is the head actually touching the platter when at speed. The head acts like a farm plough. Sorry, this has been a bit long winded and I may not have been very good at some of the explanation but it is early in the day.

Just wondering how much damage you'd do if you microwaved a hard drive for a decent period of time put a cup of water in there so it doesn't kill the microwave. If I had realised what day it was I may have waited a day to reply.

I am a subscriber to the Windows Secrets newsletter and a member of their forum. I happened to go there today and I was looking through old articles. Anyone can read the abstract but you need to be paid up to read the whole article, so quoting from it may cause trouble.

I didn't recall the article so I had a good read. There was a reference in it to a research paper titled Overwriting Hard Drive Data: The Great Wiping Controversy which I found here. The authors conclude that a one pass write or wipe is statistically sufficient to make previous data unrecoverable.

This paper is highly technical and if you intend to read it then look up the meaning of stochastic. The best way to read it may be the abstract and introduction on page 1 and then the conclusion on page Here is a quote of the last two sentences from the conclusion: It is unlikely that a recovered drive will have not been used for a period of time and the interaction of defragmentation, file copies and general use that overwrites data areas negates any chance of data recovery.

The fallacy that data can be forensically recovered using an electron microscope or related means needs to be put to rest. There is much more to the conclusion than this. Archive View Return to standard view.

FWIW I used ccleaner wipe drive 1-pass and then used recuva and couldn't find anything. Run CCleaner off a newer Hirens boot cd. Hirens has Shredder as well in Mini Windows under Wintools. Full disk encryption with a long, random password that you can't remember.

What was the utility? What sort of HD was that? What hardware is that? This doesn't claim overwritten data can be recovered either, in fact it explicitly dis-claims it, perhaps you ought to read it ; Yeah I read it.

I'm afraid it does. Yes, any tool that does a single write pass of the disk will permanently wipe the data. Next time use either in order of strength: Eraser scheduler doesn't work too well in win 7.

No you haven't, don't tell fibs. One of the better ones I've read recently! I think anyone that claims to have done so, is talking jive. Actually that is a good article. He certainly does, but not under that name.

I was appalled at the misinformation in that article That'd be right, not only can't we believe all we read on the internet or in the paper, but we can't trust the journalism we read in the popular press. I was appalled at the misinformation in that article Yeah, I agree but I wasn't bothered.

I always believed that one wiping pass is enough. This paper may convince others. With that said, it's quite easy to test. If that works with your display, a native install is going to work too. If you want Windows software then that's what you should run it on.

I recommend KDE, it feels a bit more well put together for a desktop these days. With regards to your question about triple monitors. I mean, I managed to get triple monitors working on FreeBSD without much fuss so I am not sure of how much help I can be when I say "it should just work".

I am obviously biased. But, it's likely that it will just work, the open source drivers for AMD are significantly superior to the open source drivers for nVidia. Although I only have nVidia cards running and I have 2 setups with triple monitors.

Give Ubuntu desktop a try. The installer allows you to run the OS live without installation. You can use this to see if Ubuntu is something you may be interested in. Try before you "buy" so to speak.

In a very similar vein, Linux Mint also allows you to do this. Both OSes work very well out of the box and there are large communities for help. My experience with Ubuntu xubuntu Especially for someone who wants to run 3 monitors.

Crespyl 5 months ago. I'll add the caveat that for HiDPI displays you're still likely to run into scaling issues, particularly if you have differently sized displays. I just installed Ubuntu on a shiny new to me Precision laptop.

When I hooked it to my 27 inch, x monitor, the scaling became a disaster between the two screens. Setting the scale on the fly can also be a disaster. Best thing I have found is to set the res down on the higher-res monitor, and set the scaling to the same on both monitors.

Or just never move things between monitors. Modern machines that seemingly have "no GPU" have an integrated GPU that's powerful enough for driving multiple monitors, desktop compositing and rendering some 3D modern games at p, older games at higher resolution.

Aren't you still limited by the number of HDMI ports anyway? Does AMD do this or is that still just an Intel thing? The tradeoff is that the CPU half of AMD's processors is kinda bad - they are all derived from either Jaguar laptop processors or Bulldozer, they desperately need to be refreshed with Ryzen.

This is something that is only in "client" processors. I have a small underpowered desktop running in my house that only has onboard graphics and it runs Ubuntu The Intel integrated graphic card of my laptop does handle 3 screens fine and I dont need to mess with drivers, everything works well out of the box.

Didn't know laptops existed with 3 monitor ports. Which model laptop are you using, and would you recommend it for programming? As a data point, the development desktop I'm using runs 3 monitors on Linux Fedora They're hooked into a single AMD R9 graphics card overkill, but it was hanging around spare when putting together the pc.

No HiDPI stuff, and everything works fairly well. Using the "Xfce" spin of Fedora. Didn't need to do any complicated setup. The monitors were all detected fine without mucking around, and I just needed to drag them into position in the Xfce4 gui tool so it knew which one was on the left, middle, right.

Lacking details, so nobody can promise anything, but I have run my current desktop with three monitors on two video cards. I currently run it with two monitors and two cards, with one bound to a Windows VM. That is somewhat trickier to set up, but multiple monitors should be fine.

My advice echoes others - you can try before you buy install with a few flavors of Linux; see what happens. If you have trouble, try to find a fellow human who can help - X is a little surprising to configure, if you haven't done it before.

Nullabillity 5 months ago. How long ago was it, and what GPU did you try it with? It was about 2 years ago. I'm using a multi monitor setup where i'm clubbing my onboard graphics card with the PCIe card both ATI, though the onboard card is a very old model.

On windows it works seamlessly but on Linux I couldn't do it. Thanks for the advice, I will try it again today. Ubuntu makes this pretty easy. Also solus 3 would be a good choice. And there are a number of resources and tutorials for this very thing.

You can also customize your desktop environment so the critique of scroll bars and such can be resolved. ElementaryOS [0] prides itself in it's UI. Granted, this is very much a matter of taste, but if you're into the whole Mac look-and-feel, you might like it.

But frankly I find the Gnome-Shell desktop to be beautiful. Elementary os looks beautiful. This is exactly the kind of stuff i found missing, will definitely install it today. If Elementary ends up not being to your tastes, do try Gnome-Shell.

The UI is a bit "different", in the sense that it tries to innovate in quite a few places, but it's definitely pretty. I found the animations on ElementaryOS to feel That being said, the majority of UI animations in Linux are like that, so meh.

Um what did you install? I would be surprised that you would have a problem. Ubuntu should also be found. Stay away from Fedora and Arch unless you don't mind getting into some set up files.

I tried Ubuntu only. Couldn't get the third monitor to work. As per another comment I will give it another try and see if things have changed now. After trying a number of distros, I settled on Ubuntu and a while ago switched from Unity to Gnome.

Most of the time I use two monitors without any problem and I live in a terminal. KDE has that modern look, so install Kububtu, then figure out how to set up multiple monitors through kde. Don't go down that rabbit hole.

Linux is not for desktop despite many years of efforts. Even the distro with the greatest focus on UI elementaryOS looks like a toy. Just my honest opinion after 15 years of continuous use in university and work. XKCD still relevant today: I have been on Xubuntu for about 4 years now, and love it.

Just got a new touchscreen laptop with win10 on it and hate the experience. Switched the wife over to Xubuntu as her win10 laptop was running like crap, and she barely notices any difference in the experience except the Linux system is faster.

I think for a lot of people who want to just browse the Web and watch movies, Linux is more than up to the task. And suit, recently even libreoffice is working fine for my simple needs for word processing and spreadsheet work.

It's like driving a car you have to work on all the time or something. I have fond memories of doing it but I no longer have the time or inclination to spend that much time configuring my desktop. Lets be real; as much as I shit on systemd, since it released the desktop experience for people is much more well-rounded and I think it has helped distro maintainers really push usability.

Usability of Linux in the past 10 years has been exponentially increasing. They're going to need something else. Ubuntu made a mistake not contributing to Wayland but they were right to try Unity.

Ironically, Canonical is making money mainly with cloud services. Meaning servers - what Linux is good at. The ability to venture down the rabbit as far as you want, without black-boxes.

I think a lot of us sit here today because of that privilege. It absolutely has its place. That place just isn't the mainstream desktop consumer. ComodoHacker 5 months ago. Feels like you've vaccinated you brain and developed antibodies of security-conscious computer usage patterns.

Yes, because it was a lesson learned the hard way: Years ago I used to use CCleaner and their disk defragmentor tool. Now I too am on Windows 10 and use neither, still it's sad to see this sort of thing happen to what I remember being decent free software.

If you have an SSD then defragmentation does nothing. I rescued my neighbor's Mac from an adware invasion using Malwarebytes so I I would argue that not all these tools are created equal. However, what if it was their installer that was attacked in such fashion?

Trusting old memories of what's good or not can be dangerous. I remember getting caught out once by CoreTemp which suddenly packed a load of dung in its default installer. Sourceforge revolutionizes open source by providing free hosting for projects!

I cringe every time I encounter a project hosted on SF and have to play their stupid find the download link game. PenguinCoder 5 months ago. Uh have you been there recently? Like in the past year?

The company is under new management, and cleaned up their act and download pages a lot. Sourceforge is headed in a better direction again. Yet while SourceForge improved, Slashdot became a clone of HN's front page and is a cesspool of horrid editing staff, now.

So take that as you will. That tells me that SourceForge is probably bound to degrade some time soon. For apps it supports, Ninite is a good way to avoid that kind of thing, although it may not have stopped the CCleaner issue.

They package their installer with extraneous bundles removed. I hope Ninite reads this and pulls them off their list of installers. It should be automatically removed from end users by Ninite as a direct response to this. Well, it's not on the list currently, so either they never had it or they did indeed remove it.

BoxStarter is looking promising - http: I pay for MalwareBytes, I think it's worth it. Apart from that, I just use Defender. Ditched when they started pushing FUD years ago. I worked in the anti-malware industry for 5 years.

Pretty much across the board, this kind of software does more harm than good. AV on corporate email servers or your email provider makes sense. Literally saw malware in the wild that exploited AV software.

I run Malwarebytes as well these days, but that's it. For aimless browsing I use my Linux box, and one of my favorite browser extensions is uBlock Origin. I do, but I try to see if it's from a trustworthy source.

Pirform has been around for ages and has always been as "trustworthy" a software publisher as one could hope for. Supply-chain compromises are hard to completely mitigate, particularly with bundled windows installers.

Advertising never works for me. Linux and Windows are worlds apart. There has been a number of cases of installers from trusted developers being infected lately. For example Transmission being infected twice On our side developers we need to be careful with this idea that "we will know" when something is wrong and be more careful when deploying software.

It would also be nice if some form of tool could be used to test a binary to make sure it only contains what it should contain sort of a whitelist of symbol names compared to the source files, idk I'm sure something along these lines probably exists for some different purpose.

First of all, this is why reproducible builds getting bit-for-bit identical binaries independent of the machine used to build the software is something we should be putting much more work into. The Debian folks are doing an amazing job there.

Another important point is that distributions have already solved effectively all of these problems. We have automated building and signing systems that mean that installation and upgrades are done in ways that are not vulnerable even to fairly sophisticated attacks.

You can build packages locally if you want to verify them, and modifying a package after it has been built invalidates the signature that all modern package managers require before installing a package.

I get that distributions aren't "sexy" but it's getting quite frustrating seeing all these communities make the same mistakes that distributions made and learned from more than 20 years ago. It's not really a practical solution even assuming everything is open source.

As I posted above, we have a build service that does this automatically for you. It takes maybe 30 minutes to create a few spec files, and now it's supported by a bunch of different distributions. You can then point your users at the repo or mirror the repo if you prefer.

Also OBS lets you create forks of projects that just inherit the unmodified packages and said forks can also be cross-host so you don't need to self-host a whole distribution. I agree that doing everything I mentioned manually is hard, that's again why I said that distributions have solved this problem and made it easy.

But who would use the build service? The consumer of the software or the publisher? A user could if they were really paranoid rebuild the packages locally, with two or three commands. You can download the source code that OBS used both as a src RPM generated by the builder and the OBS repo that the builder was given read-only access to, and OBS supports cryptographic signatures of the originating source with gpg-offline keys to avoid WoT attacks.

If your developers are using sane source control practices use GPG keys for every commit, but especially tags then you are protected against that too. Of course, reproducible builds is something that would solve this problem even better protecting against attacks on OBS that cause it to add source that are not in the repo.

As a side point, our threat model doesn't fully trust the nodes compiling the software so such attacks are fairly limited in scope but I'm not a developer of OBS so I'm really not the right person to be asked these questions.

I don't know what they're planning to do, but we could need only a few parties doing the verifications. If a build yields the wrong binary then the release is flagged and nobody gets it. Apt should check against the expected results.

Many things could go wrong with this mainly attacks on the expected results db, it should be replicated but the idea should work. The thing is if the threat is any machine on the publisher side being infected, then it sorts of need to be verified by the consumer of the software, a bit like compiling a checksum when you download software.

Debian packages are signed. It is hard to make software distribution completely secure. But, one could imagine creating pretty strong guarantees. An attacker would need to compromise either: I consider 3 to be the most serious thread.

But in this scenario, only the distribution packagers need to inspect the source changes. In the common scenario where you download from a vendor e. Another possibility would be to have strong sandboxing for applications.

An application could still participate in DDoS attacks, etc. Right, and this is why we need reproducible builds. And why exactly can't the source be compromised? Filligree 5 months ago. By default it uses a binary cache, but it'd be easy to disable that if you want to.

And reproducible builds are a work in progress. I'm not sure how exactly these infections work, but one method would be to infect the developers' PCs. In which case you essentially can't trust anything. You'd need some kind of byzantine fault tolerance mandatory multi-person code review?

This is how Debian tries to prevent these kinds of attacks. You can enable AppLocker and have explicit control on what executes and what not by creating rules. I know quite a few companies that enforce its use in their employees' PCs.

As an aside, AppLocker was trivially bypassable for several years -- there were two different APIs that allowed you to set an "ignore AppLocker" flag. We used to use it in high-school to play games or in my case, run gvim and some other development tools.

I think that there needs to be a more complete solution than just "secure the developers machines". You need to have peer-review, where the developers sign commits to approve them. Isn't this pretty much mandatory with SOX compliance anyway?

My first thought would be a little process running on a server not on your network that pulls the download every so often, say once a day, and texts you if it is different. You'd expect a text after you push your new version, but if you get one out of the blue, then you'd know something was up.

Binary analysis for each software you install might be too cumbersome for most developers. It might not be the best, but it's definitely something that works to mitigate some hacks. Thing is, you can't even trust little snitch these days[1]: You can think of it as a firewall for your filesystem and devices.

I use Little Snitch too. I had a Little Flocker license, but the rules were quite painful to maintain. Especially if you are also using the Terminal and command-line apps. That creates an interesting conflict between automatic updates you want to be patched against the latest security vulnerabilities and manual, more infrequent updates you are less exposed to a compromised update directly and automatically infecting your machine.

I only recall one instance of compromised Transmission installer. JohnTHaller 5 months ago. It's also worth noting that the default installer for CCleaner automatically installs Chrome and sets it as the default browser with no notification in the default process.

Unless you click "More At least it was like this two weeks ago. Had to uninstall bundleware Chrome again from multiple family members' PCs. That's why I package it for our PortableApps. What would happen if someone got malware on to your machine that specifically targeted PortableApps.

The VLC authors also report that Google tried to pay them quite huge amounts to include Chrome as well: If a significant amount of users gets the software without intending to, the install was malicious, and should be removed.

Google pays companies to do new installs of Chrome. They're supposed to make it explicit, but Google doesn't really police it. It's usually via 'dark patterns' as it is with most free Windows antivirus apps where it shows a small indication at the bottom of the screen on a window that's about something else.

For example, Avast sneaks it in as part of an automatic update on the Continue window: Which browser dominates should be based on its quality not how much money you spend on it: PirateAvogadro 5 months ago. Having chrome installed by whatever [dark] pattern is at least putting it on an even footing with the platform's default browser - for those who would never proactively change their browser, this at least is closer to such a browser meritocracy.

Every one of my family members I have to uninstall it for is already running a fully-up-to-date copy of Firefox. The question is usually "why does the web look different? What about putting it on an even footing with Firefox, because currently that's its biggest competitor.

The thing is with Firefox that if it's on your computer is most likely because you installed it yourself. Pal, you know you're revealing the selves of both MS and Google! So, they fucked it. AdmiralAsshat 5 months ago.

My Windows 7 machine still has a nightly scheduled cronjob to run ccleaner in headless mode. I mostly used it to automatically securely wipe anything I put into the Recycle Bin. Fortunately I don't think I've updated the program in years, so it probably doesn't have any malware in it, but still, rather scary to think that was used to be a daily program for me is now infected.

Which reminds me, I probably need to call my dad and anyone else I installed that for CharlesDodgson 5 months ago. I really liked the style of this article, it explained things that are very technical in a way that someone with moderate knowledge of the concepts can grasp.

Hats off to the author! With all these malware problems I look forward to more heavily sandboxed operating systems based on capabilities. Maybe Fuchsia will be that operating system, if it does not turn out to be a google spyware hell.

I think what you're looking for is Qubes OS https: I think you're just going to see more stuff become a Web app. Sandboxing doesn't make much sense with a system utility like this. Isn't that what Microsoft are attempting with the Windows Store?

I hope I can make Redox be that operating system. CapacitorSet 5 months ago. Jdam 5 months ago. I don't understand the question. Maintenance will always be a thing, carried out by humans, cron, or the os itself doesn't really matter.

Why doesn't MS Windows do the maintenance - CCleaner does things like clean up ancient cache files, remove Windows update files, remove registry entries for software that's no longer installed. That sort of maintenance seems like it's the result of poor design in an OS that has the hood welded shut.

I actually used ccleaner on Win 10 recently, an MS update had associated loads of files with TWINUI which wasn't installed making things like viewing images impossible. Ccleaner found of the order of thousands of stale entries, removed them and made a backup.

It also let me simply check and disable startup programs - I don't think Win 10 has a way to do that in the user UI? Uninstalling old style Windows software is a hard problem that generally can't be done in a foolproof way, without potentially breaking stuff, due to bad legacy design decisions like giving programs free reign to install stuff wherever they want, without a proper application model nor dependency tracking.

Coments:

25.09.2010 : 14:02 Vudogami:

CCleaner is a system-optimizing software that cleans users' computers in ( MB) Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows 10, English. Other languages/5(18). Malware identified in CCleaner You can download the source code that OBS used I actually used ccleaner on Win 10 recently. For an unspecified length of time, legitimate CCleaner downloads appear to have been distributing malware alongside the intended software, potentially infecting.



Kashakar Apr 08, · Ive been using the wiping free space tool in CCleaner I have some sensitive How good is CCleaner at Drive Wiping? the procedures used by police. Copyright © 2017 Apr 08, · Ive been using the wiping free space tool in CCleaner I have some sensitive How good is CCleaner at Drive Wiping? the procedures used by police. - Ccleaner win 10 81 police code.